How Putin Could Be Charged With War Crimes
Pressure mounts on Russia’s Vladimir Putin as he faces the potential of being charged with war crimes.
April 19, 2022
Vladimir Putin, President of Russia, started the war on Ukraine February 24, 2022 and since then, the Russian Military has produced horrendous sites that no human eye should ever have to witness.
The Russian troops stationed in Ukraine are believed to have committed many atrocious acts against Ukraine with Putin now being accused by many of committing war crimes.
President of the United States, Joe Biden, has joined many others who have called Putin a “war criminal”, but what are war crimes and how can Putin be tried for potentially violating international laws?
War crimes are defined as a violation of the laws governing international/non-international conflict where the person being accused is believed to willfully commit crimes against humanity during a time of war. For more on war crimes and how someone can violate them, see this link: https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/war-crimes.shtml
Russia has appeared to commit numerous actions that violate international war laws. Some attacks that might be considered war crimes include targeting civilian areas, civilians, hospitals and places of shelter, just to name a few.
“Civilians are being killed and maimed in what appear to be indiscriminate attacks, with Russian forces using explosive weapons with wide effects in or near populated areas,” OHCHR (Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights) spokesperson Liz Throssell said.
In many past conflicts, war crimes have been committed and punished.
One of the most recent people that has been convicted as a war criminal is Anwar Raslan.
Raslan, a former Syrian military officer, was accused of crimes against humanity, charged with 4,000 counts of torture, 58 counts of murder and charges of sexual assault during the al-Asssad regime. He was sentenced to life in prison on January 13, 2022 for all charges except 31 counts of murder.
War criminals can have a wide range of punishments that range from a few years, to life in prison. Some may even get the death penalty, but punishments are all dependent on how severe the war crimes were.
Multiple investigations are ongoing to determine if Vladimir Putin, his associates and the Russian military did commit war crimes. Putin continues to deny claims that he is a war criminal.
If Putin is charged with war crimes, there are many ways in which he could be prosecuted.
One of those ways is through the International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC is a court that tries people that have broken serious international laws including: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and aggression.
There are limits to what the court has the power to do.
For instance, the court cannot investigate Russia for the crime of aggression because Russia is not part of the ICC. The court also cannot hold a trial against Putin until he is in the courtroom and they have no power to bring him to court if he stays in Russia.
“There would be no trial at the ICC of Putin until he is physically present in the courtroom,” said David Scheffler, first ever U.S. Ambassador at Large for War Crimes Issues and led the U.S. into talks about establishing the ICC.
There are other ways that could allow Putin to be charged as a war criminal including having other countries prosecute him or setting up a special tribunal similar to the Nuremberg Tribunal, that was used to prosecute Nazi war criminals after WWII.
Many have supported the idea of a special tribunal and, if one is set up, it can solve a key problem that would make prosecuting Putin difficult within the ICC. It can allow Putin to be prosecuted for aggression, even if he stays in Russia.
The war in Ukraine continues to rage on as questions mount over whether Vladimir Putin will be charged with any of the war crimes that he is accused of committing.
Only time can tell the fate of the Russian leader and the future of what humanity has to hold.
Anonyim_EHS Alumni 2021 • May 9, 2022 at 1:20 pm
The Geneva conventions are only one document within the UN. which the UN can not charge Russia with war crimes because of Article 51 of the UN Security charter. Also, the ICC isn’t even recognized by us or Russia. Also the UN despite being an international organization. The Security Council only has a select 5 members allowed to vote. Russia, China, Great Britain, Northern Ireland and the US. It takes a unilateral majority or everyone to agree for something to be passed. One member vetoes it is dropped. Lastly the geneva conventions are only added to domestic homeland security interpretations that vary across nations. The US could have been sued and convicted of war crimes in Iraq and the torture of prisoners of war. But it wasn’t due to Article 51, and our policy on domestic security plus the Patriot Act (which is still a law just not enforced). This is the same for Russia.
But nice work on the source used. However, grammar and references could be improved in format, Try using APA. Plus Add more references to back up your interpretation and an explanation of why you believe it should be interpreted so. But when explaining doesn’t just read our and the UN’s policy read Russia’s as well. Since what Russia agreed to is what will be used.